Choose one the Slobogin text, such as Tarasoff vs. Regents of the University of California (p. 214), or one of its many offspring (including Shaw v. Glickman), or other cases, including Jaffee v. Redmond, State v. Cole, or State v. Andring). Using the Questions and Comments at the end of each case, discuss some of the issues addressed by the appellate or Supreme court in that case. Please do not use more than 2-3 sentences to describe the case; everyone has read it. Rather, offer your opinion about the decision and its implications for practice, or find conflicting case law and compare the two cases.
Issue post is due by Day 4 (Thursday) and at least one substantive response post is due by Day 6 (Saturday).
REFERENCES/RESOURCES
- Slobogin, C., Hafemeister, L.T., & Mossman, D. (2020). Law and the mental health system: Civil and criminal aspects (7th ed.). West Academic Publishing.
- Chapter 5, “Confidentiality and Access to Records”
Would you like to discuss this project or get it done?
Reach out on WHATSapp at +1 (240) 389-5520
Or
Place an order on our website for quick help
Guarantees
A+ Paper
Timely Delivery
Zero Plagiarism
Zero AI

Leave a Reply