A lesson can be perfectly planned, but if not implemented correctly it may not be effective for learning. Gathering feedback from others regarding implement

A lesson can be perfectly planned, but if not implemented correctly it may not be effective for learning. Gathering feedback from others regarding implementation can lead to improved practices for new and experienced teachers. Observing others and being observed is a great way to provide feedback and gather additional data on a lesson’s effectiveness for supporting students in meeting the objective.

Allocate at least 2 hours in an inclusive K-12 classroom that includes students with disabilities for this field experience.

Implement the activity developed with your mentor teacher in Clinical Field Experience B or another activity using technology with the whole class or a small group of students. Be sure to utilize the differentiation strategies you and your mentor teacher discussed to meet the needs of all students in the class/group.

Following the implementation, seek feedback from your mentor teacher. Discuss the following:

How the implementation went, include whether the students met the objective of the activity. Discuss how you made this determination.
What you and your mentor felt was effective, and what you would do differently next time.
The effectiveness of the differentiation and how the technology supported students during the activity.

Spend any remaining field experience hours observing or assisting the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.

Following the implementation and discussion, write a 250-500 word reflection. Summarize the implementation of the activity and feedback from your mentor teacher. How did the technology used in the activity help meet the needs of all the students in the group or class? What parts of the lesson were effective and what would you change for next time? Did the students meet the objectives of the activity and how did you know?

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

ESD-530Rubric-ClinicalFieldExperienceC_ImplementingDifferentiatedActivities.pdf

Clinical Field Experience C: Implementing Differentiated Activities – Rubric

Reflection 8 points

Criteria Description

Reflection

5. Target 8 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is thorough and specific.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is detailed.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is vague.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is inadequate.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Technology Use 8 points

Criteria Description

Technology Use

5. Target 8 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is insightfully discussed.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is competently discussed.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is lacking detail.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is unclear.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Effectiveness 8 points

Criteria Description

Effectiveness

5. Target 8 points

Reflection thoughtfully discussed what was effective about the activity and what

would be changed for next time. Proficient reasoning is provided.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

Reflection clearly discussed what was effective about the activity and what would be

changed for next time. Relevant reasoning is provided.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

Reflection vaguely discussed what was effective about the activity and what would

be changed for next time. Weak reasoning is provided.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

Reflection ineffectively discussed what was effective about the activity and what

would be changed for next time. Fails to provide reasoning.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Objectives 8 points

Criteria Description

Objectives

5. Target 8 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is expertly discussed and sound

reasoning is provided.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is discussed and reasoning is provided.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is unclearly discussed and reasoning is

not provided.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is incomprehensible.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Organization 4 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 4 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 3.48 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 2.96 points

The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense

of the main idea.

2. Insufficient 2.76 points

The content is unorganized with and indiscernible sequence. The ideas presented

are compartmentalized, and the main idea is unclear.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

https:

Would you like to discuss this project or get it done?

Reach out on WHATSapp at +1 (240) 389-5520

Or
Place an order on our website for quick help

Guarantees

A+ Paper
Timely Delivery
Zero Plagiarism
Zero AI

Online Homeworker

A lesson can be perfectly planned, but if not implemented correctly it may not be effective for learning. Gathering feedback from others regarding implement

Leave a Reply Cancel reply