1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?
2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?
3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?
4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?

Would you like to discuss this project or get it done? 

Reach out on WHATSapp at +1 (240) 389-5520

Or 
 Place an order on our website for quick help

Guarantees

A+ Paper
 Timely Delivery
 Zero Plagiarism
 Zero AI